|
Front Page
| International
Report |
Weingarten rights |
Conservatives | In
Memoriam & Got an O.U.C.H. |
Grievance Roster
THE CONSERVATIVES WANT YOU
Opinion by
Michael G Secrest
From time to
time someone will call the Union Hall wanting help with some work
problem, or seeking advice about how to work within the system to
get something done. When asked where they work, so we can figure
which steward to refer them to, they say they don’t want their boss
to know that the union is involved. That’s like saying, ok, I’ll
date you but I don’t want to go anywhere my friends might see you.
Come on, we’re prettier than that! The conservatives are just
trying to paint us ugly.
The economic
conservative’s philosophy insists that the best thing for the
American economy is to get more money into the hands of the rich.
The rich will then use it to expand their businesses to make
themselves richer, which will create more jobs and more job security
for us working folks. The last six years we have witnessed this
idea put into practice. Has it helped us?
That theory was
good in practice when the rich factory owner lived in the mansion on
the hill and we all lived in the shacks in the valley. It wasn’t
good for us, but
it had more validity then than it does now. Now, the only money the
business owner spends in America is for interpreters to translate
the word “widget” into some third world language and for lawyers to
find ways to avoid paying taxes on all the profits they make from
marking their products up 1000% or more.
Over a century
ago, the working people in the shacks in the valley felt the sting
of this conservative ideology and stood together as a union movement
to demand a decent wage for their labor. For more than 50 years,
they paid the price in turmoil, blood and even lives to get
something better for their families. And from that struggle and
sacrifice came the rewards of a decent wage and a decent living for
a large new population of middle class Americans. By the 1960s,
unions were powerful enough that working people were well enough off
to educate their children and with that education, and with working
people having the free time to exercise their political leanings,
came freedom and power for working people. Women and minorities,
through much sacrifice of their own, and the middle class in
general, led the country in a new direction; a direction that
Conservatives vowed to destroy before it ruined their way of life
forever. This war against the middle class and the unionism that
created it, started with Ronald Reagan and I pray culminated with
George W. Bush. Though the most transparent in his animosity
against the middle class, I don’t think President Bush is worse than
any other conservative politician. He was just more powerful
because he had a conservative Congress to follow suit. Giving large
tax breaks to the rich is a conservative thing to do. Trying to
bust up unions is a conservative thing to do. Passing laws to
injure working people and make it harder for unions to do business
is a conservative thing to do. Rewarding business leaders who move
their businesses overseas is a conservative thing to do. A century
ago, when working people started fighting for a better life for
themselves and their children, they created the middle class.
Destroying the middle class to get back to the good old days of the
rich man on the hill and the poor working class in shacks on the
flood plain is a conservative thing to do.
I will not fall
for the conservative line that they hold my core values in their
hearts. What they hold in their hearts is my destruction. They
will say that they are patriotic and that they love America to
appeal to my patriotism. They will say that they are religious and
that they love God to appeal to my spirituality. They will never
look down to see my plight, but there eye is not on the flag, or on
the sky, but on the mansion on the hill.
Times are
improving for working people. It’s time to stand up and help them
improve. We all know a
union is a shield against the destruction of everything we stand
for. And we know that unions are as
relevant to the future of the middle class as they were to our
beginnings. |